The imaginary animosity between Cambridge students and ‘townies’ mirrors a similarly baseless divide often seen within the student body itself: the supposed friction between private and state school students. Both cases stem from the same root of unfounded prejudice and stereotyping.

In the streets of Cambridge, where centuries-old college buildings shoulder with modern shops and cafes, an invisible line often seems to separate two distinct populations: the students and the ‘townies’. This divide, as old as the University itself, persists in whispered conversations, subtle glances, and sometimes, regrettably, in outright prejudice. But is this division real, or is it merely a persistent myth that both sides unwittingly perpetuate?

“We come to Cambridge for a few short years yet some of us presume to look down upon those who call this city their permanent home”

Let’s start off with comments I’ve heard after a formal, dressed in our formal clothes: that we will get attacked by townies. Already this is perpetuating the notion that ‘townies’ are inherently more dangerous or prone to criminal behaviour than students. This idea, often encapsulated in the paranoid warning that locals might ‘mug’ unsuspecting students, is as baseless as it is harmful. The idea that local residents are lying in wait to pounce on unwary students is not just false; it’s a damaging stereotype that undermines community cohesion. This attitude is, frankly, snobby and short-sighted. We come to Cambridge for a few short years yet some of us presume to look down upon those who call this city their permanent home. It’s a classic case of mistaking temporary residency for superiority, and it’s high time we addressed it head-on.

The origins of this town-gown divide can be traced back to the University’s medieval roots, when students and locals often clashed over resources and rights. However, in the 21st century, clinging to these outdated notions is not just anachronistic – it’s counterproductive. Cambridge, the city, benefits enormously from the presence of the University, just as the University thrives within the vibrant urban environment that surrounds it. This symbiotic relationship is often overlooked in discussions that emphasise division rather than mutual benefit.

One of the key factors perpetuating this divide is the collegiate nature of student life. Many students spend only three or four years in Cambridge, often living within the bubble of college accommodation and social circles. This can lead to a lack of meaningful interaction with long-term residents, fostering an “us vs. them” mentality on both sides. However, those students who do engage with the wider community – through volunteering, part-time work, or simply frequenting local businesses – often find their preconceptions challenged and their Cambridge experience enriched.

Moreover, the assumption that there’s a clear distinction between ‘students’ and ‘locals’ ignores the reality that many University staff, researchers, and even some students are long-term Cambridge residents. The boundaries between these groups are far more porous than the stereotypes suggest.

“It’s important for students to make an effort to step outside the university bubble”

The persistence of this divide also reflects broader societal issues of class and privilege. Cambridge University, despite efforts to widen participation, still draws a significant proportion of its student body from privileged backgrounds. This can create a perceived gulf between students and local residents, particularly those from working-class backgrounds. However, it’s crucial to remember that Cambridge, the city, is home to people from all socioeconomic backgrounds, just as the University itself is striving for greater diversity.

So, how can we bridge this perceived divide? University initiatives that encourage students to engage with the local community – through volunteering, civic engagement projects, or cultural events – can help break down barriers. Similarly, efforts by the city council and local organisations create spaces and events that bring students and residents together.

It’s also important for students to make an effort to step outside the university bubble. Exploring local neighbourhoods, shopping at independent businesses, participating in community events and touching grass can provide a more rounded experience of Cambridge life. Conversely, local residents might benefit from taking advantage of the many public lectures, exhibitions, and events hosted by the university, which are often open to all.

Ultimately, the divide between Cambridge students and ‘townies’ is largely a construct – a relic of historical tensions that no longer reflect the reality of life in this dynamic city. The fear that locals are out to ‘mug’ students is not just unfounded; it’s a harmful myth that does a disservice to both groups.