Clare College refused to reimburse student following ‘harrowing’ suspension

The College ‘refused to comply’ with the recommendation of £3,000 in financial reimbursement

There have been five previous occasions where providers were considered non-complaint with OIA recommendationsLouis Ashworth

by Amy Howell

This article is 4 years old

Friday April 30 2021, 2:34am

Clare College “refused to comply” with recommendations from the Office of the Independent Adjudicator (OIA) following complaints of their handling of a student’s suspension, the 2020 OIA report stated.

The OIA, who offer free consultation for University students in England and Wales, independent of higher education institutions, made three recommendations following the complaint of an unnamed student.

The OIA made two recommendations relating to the student being permitted to return to study, as well as recommending that the College pay the student £3,000 for “distress and inconvenience.” Although the student was permitted to return, the report states that the financial recommendation was not accepted by the College.

Speaking to Varsity about their experience, the student, who was not identified in the report due to the small size of the College, described the experience as “harrowing,” detailing that the College had “torn me [the student] from my friends, my coping strategies and every bit of support I was getting.”

They added: “I don’t trust the college at all, I’m scared to go to them with anything now,” and that “this situation really highlighted to me that being disabled and a person of colour in Cambridge is awful.”

A Case Study of Failure: A Varsity investigation into Homerton’s welfare crisis

The report outlines the complaints received by the review body, alongside identifying trends in the issues raised. This year’s report placed particular emphasis on the impact of the pandemic on their findings.

In response to the College’s decision, the OIA expressed their “hope that even at this late stage Clare College will reconsider its position and pay the student the compensation we recommended in recognition of the distress and inconvenience they have suffered.”

In a personal letter from Clare’s Master received by the student, the College maintained that the intermission was in the student’s best interests and that Clare did not plan to pay the additional £3,000.

In line with OIA’s Compliance Protocol, the College’s failure to comply led to their actions being reported to the OIA’s Board in March this year. Previously, there have been five occasions where providers were unintentionally non-compliant or caused serious delay in compliance to OIA recommendations, two of which related to issues directly linked to students.

Varsity has contacted Clare College and the University of Cambridge for comment.

Support Varsity

Varsity is the independent newspaper for the University of Cambridge, established in its current form in 1947. In order to maintain our editorial independence, our print newspaper and news website receives no funding from the University of Cambridge or its constituent Colleges.

We are therefore almost entirely reliant on advertising for funding and we expect to have a tough few months and years ahead.

In spite of this situation, we are going to look at inventive ways to look at serving our readership with digital content and of course in print too!

Therefore we are asking our readers, if they wish, to make a donation from as little as £1, to help with our running costs. Many thanks, we hope you can help!