Exclusive: Video shows Union speaker’s Hitler impersonation at ‘good taste’ debate
Varsity has received exclusive footage of the impersonation, which includes the Union President’s admission to being drunk at the debate
CN: contains racial slurs and an impersonation that involves the voicing of antisemitic and racist views
Footage obtained by Varsity shows Union speaker Andrew Graham-Dixon doing an impersonation of Adolf Hitler, with Union President Keir Bradwell applauding and commenting that it was the “longest Hitler impression” the chamber had ever heard. The footage has not been publicly shared by the Union.
Bradwell has been criticised for not intervening during the speaker’s impersonation.
The incident took place at a debate at the Union on Thursday night (04/11), with the audience voting with Graham-Dixon against the motion: “this house believes there is no such thing as good taste.”
Graham-Dixon spoke in opposition of the motion alongside American computer scientist Paul Graham. Art critic Dr JJ Charlesworth spoke for the proposition.
Graham-Dixon impersonated Hitler during his argument that art can be made in bad taste. He has since clarified that the impersonation was not an endorsement of Hitler or antisemitism, but rather it was used as an example in his argument and to “underline the utterly evil nature of Hitler and his regime.”
The event has caused outrage amongst students and alumni alike.
The Union’s Equalities officer, Zara Salaria, said that Graham-Dixon’s impression was “absolutely unacceptable” and “utterly horrifying.”
Former President of the Cambridge Union, Joel Rosen, tweeted that he felt “physically sick” from what he saw at the event.
I feel physically sick. I joined the Union following the Malaysian PM’s Antisemitic outburst.
- Joel Rosen (@jrosentweets) November 5, 2021
I and many others invested hundreds of hours trying to change the organisation and make it a safer place for Jews and people of colour.
It hasn’t changed:https://t.co/b1ERRqSbdT
Bradwell has since apologised for his “failure to intervene” during the debate, stating that neither he “nor the society condones the thoughtless and grotesque language” used by the speaker.
- Comment / Cambridge’s safety nets are often superficial20 November 2024
- Lifestyle / How to survive a visit from a home friend19 November 2024
- Comment / Cambridge’s LinkedIn culture has changed the meaning of connection15 November 2024
- News / Cambridge ‘breaking agreement’ with pro-Palestine students19 November 2024
- Features / Vintage Varsity: the gowns they are a-going15 November 2024